Carbohydrate
consumption has been a hot button issue in the field of nutrition for decades.
The type and amount of carbohydrate we should be including in our diets is the
subject of intense debate in both the research and weight loss communities.
This is a subject that is near and dear to my own heart since carbohydrate
metabolism was the subject of my own doctoral research. A new study has been
published on this topic that is well done and very important.
The Article
This investigation
actually consists of two separate studies (Reference 1). The first is a
prospective cohort study using the ARIC cohort (The Atherosclerosis Risk in
Communities). The second is a meta-analysis including 7 separate studies.
Results
Prospective
Cohort Study in the ARIC Cohort
Over 15,000 adults
aged 45-64 years in 4 U.S. communities had their diet assessed by means of a
food frequency questionnaire and were followed for 25 years. Subjects who
consumed 50-55% of their calories as carbohydrate had the lowest mortality
rate. Subjects who ate more or less carbohydrate had an increased mortality
risk.
-A 50 year old
subject consuming less than 30% of calories as carbohydrate would have a
projected life expectancy of 29.1 years.
- A 50 year old subject
consuming 50-55% of calories as carbohydrate would have a projected life
expectancy of 33.1 years.
A 50 year old
subject consuming greater than 65% of calories as carbohydrate would have a projected
life expectancy of 32 years.
Meta-analysis
The meta-analysis
consisted of 8 separate studies with a total of 432,179 subjects and showed a
similar result. There was an increased risk of mortality with both a low and
high carbohydrate intake when compared to a moderate carbohydrate intake.
Subjects consuming
less than 40% of calories as carbohydrate had a statistically significant 20%
higher risk of mortality.
Subjects consuming
greater than 70% of calories as carbohydrate had a statistically significant
23% higher risk of mortality.
Substituting
animal fat and protein for carbohydrate resulted in an increased risk of
mortality.
Substituting
vegetable fat and protein for carbohydrate resulted in a decreased risk of
mortality.
Conclusions And Recommendations
Many people
manipulate their carbohydrate consumption in an effort to lose weight. It is
really important to examine what effect these weight loss diets may have on
long term health. My professional goal has always been to provide a strategy
that helps my client lose weight effectively, while improving overall health
and decreasing risk of chronic disease.
This study sheds
some light on the long-term health effects of diets that severely manipulate carbohydrate
consumption. The mechanisms are pretty straight forward. A low carb diet will
generally include less healthy foods such as fruits, vegetables and whole
grains and higher amounts of red meat and saturated fat. This results in fewer
vitamins, minerals, fiber and cancer fighting phytochemicals. This eating
pattern likely results in higher levels of oxidative stress, inflammation and
biological aging.
On the other hand,
diets very high in carbohydrates tend to include too many refined carbohydrates
and not enough healthy vegetable fat. This results in a much higher dietary
glycemic load, which has been associated with many negative health outcomes.
Here is what we
learn from this important study:
1) Going very low
carb is probably not a great idea.
2) Going very high
carb is probably not a great idea.
3) Stay in the mid
carb range, which is around 50-55% of calories.
4) The quality of
carbohydrates consumed is of the utmost importance. Focus on low glycemic carbs
such as fruits, vegetables, legumes and whole grains.
5) The majority of
your fat should be vegetable fats such as nuts, avocado, nut butters, seeds and
healthy vegetable oils such as olive oil and canola oil.
6) Minimize
sources of protein that are high in saturated fat, especially red meat and
processed meats like bacon, sausage, pepperoni, hot dogs, etc.
References
1) Seidelmann SB,
et al. Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality; a prospective cohort study
and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health
2018; 9:pe419-e428.
No comments:
Post a Comment